Where politics and faith dance in the shadow of the windmill.

Doubling Down on Palin

There’s no question the selection of Sarah Palin has been a hit with the social conservatives. E.M Zanotti (aka American Princess) loses herself:

I AM SO EXCITED OMG PLEASE LET THIS NOT BE A HEAD FAKE OMG. I have resisted blogging on the whole McCain Veep thing because they kept faking everyone out and telling us that this guy was clearing his schedule and this guy had the Secret Service creeping out and NOW there’s a CHARTERED JET that is landing from ALASKA and OMG SARAH PALIN OMGOMGOMGOMG!

“Whoo-hooo” also seemed to be the reaction of the day. While enthusiasm reigns the politics — the Michigan politics in particular — has me wondering.

Palin clearly comes from the Huckabee side of the Party. For them, Palin’s definitely their gal. In a somewhat parallel way, she plays the same role, receives the same enthusiasm from her base, as Obama does with the African American community. Both look like game changers.

If Palin’s candidacy is seen as fairly successful, if she brings her social conservative creds to the table while also being an effective spokesperson for the ticket — then this will add to the clout of the social conservative wing. she will fulfill her promise as a unifier. The base is rightly seen as fragmented. In terms of the upcoming gubernatorial race, Palin would seem to strengthen Terri Land’s standing, both as a successful woman, and as a social conservative (Land’s natural constituency).

But what if Palin crashes and burns?

Then the blame game comes out, the base fractures. In Michigan state politics we can see a noticeable tension between Mackinac Center and the Religious Right; or to cast it in terms of West Michigan, that tension between Ada and Grandville. The primary race in SH-72 bears the populist social conservative Yonker v. the economic liberatarian, Justin Amash. If a strong Palin run adds to the credibility, a compromised run will open the door to the economic conservatives and their belief that the way out of the political wilderness is to run even more as “a principled conservative.” In that case institutional conservatives like Mike Cox or even Peter Hoekstra would look more plausible.

Whether Palin is game-changer nationally, in Michigan she will either stitch together a party, or open up divisions. Whatever her riskiness is to McCain’s chances, she definitely brings it to State politics.

Filed under: Elections, National, , , ,

3 Responses

  1. I like your analysis of the potential impact of Sarah Palin on Michigan Republican politics.

    The economic conservatives and social conservative manipulators, so skillfully revealed by Thomas Frank in his new book, “The Wrecking Crew”, are something else. Their campaign against government, against taxes, against any kind of regulation in the name of God and country while enriching themselves from taxes paid to government is beyond hypocracy.

    The DeVos phenomena is something akin to old fashion fascism.
    Corporations created fascism after the First World War in answer to the Communist Revolution in Russia and plans of the Comintern to spread communism everywhere. Fascism was, of course, based on strict social values very similar to modern social conservatives, today (except if you were Jewish, a gypsy, or gay). Their model, once you look beyond their charismatic leaders Hitler and Mussolini, was to run the state like a corporation, to benefit corporations. This is what the Mackinac Center is about — the formalization and spread of corporate rule.

    In this context, the economic and, I think, deeply felt populism of a Sarah Palin (ala Huey Long of Louisiana) is a wild card for the money and power of the DeVos wing. So I think Sarah Palin will probably not open any door for the economic conservatives.

    But she is truly a wild card for Republicans, as you indicate. It will be interesting to watch.

  2. From the Huckabee side? Is she an economic populist? All I’ve heard about so far has been social conservatism on “values issues”. pvk

  3. Kirk Vanhouten says:

    I don’t think Devos is a fascist. The brother in law, while, you might worry.

    Libertarians (like Mackinac, not Devos) as frustrating as they are, are generally opposed to corporate welfare, tariffs and other things that are in “corporate” interest. Not to mention they are with the ACLU on social issues.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: